Unipolarity was a rollback of the equal sovereignty of all nations envisioned by the UN Charter. US primacy was declared to be "essential to the future of freedom." Bush's administration asserted in a strategy document that "America's political and military mission in the post-cold-war era will be to insure that no rival superpower is allowed to emerge." This claim to power is wedded to the ideology of liberalism. ![]() It became US doctrine only after the end of the Cold War, when in 1992, George H. The problem is not whether unipolarity can be defended against China, but whether the US elite can descend safely from its delusion. ![]() The only place unipolarity exists unchallenged is in the political culture of the United States and its most captive vassals. The issue is the US' inability to adjust to the end of its unipolar era. What's happening isn't a contest between separate, ideologically articulated conceptions of international order. Illustration: Xia Qing/GTChina is framed in the West as a "revisionist power" intent on overthrowing the "rules-based international order" and replacing it with something else - "China's world order." This way of interpreting the issue is misleading. In resisting multipolarity, the US is ultimately waging war on reality By John Pang Published: 01:14 PM
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |